First, let’s establish something. You may not recognize the term “stock index,” but if you’re reading this blog, you’ve almost certainly heard of things like the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the S&P500. Those are indices. In short, indices are collections of stocks, based on some common characteristic. Here are some of the most common indices and what they have in common:
Index name |
What lands
you on the index |
Dow Jones
Industrial Average |
Being one of
30 large, consistently-well-performing companies weighted by share
price |
S&P500 |
Being one of
the 500 biggest publicly traded companies listed on US stock exchanges weighted
by market capitalization |
Nasdaq
composite |
Being traded
on the NASDAQ stock exchange, which usually means the stock got there because
it’s in tech weighted by capitalization |
Russell 3000 |
Being one of
the 3,000 largest publicly traded companies listed on US stock exchanges weighted
by capitalization |
Russell 2000 |
Occupying positions
1001 through 3000—the bottom 2000 entries—on the Russell 3000, when listed by
capitalization |
Before we understand why these investments are so well-liked, let’s look at what
I’ve bolded. Some indices are "weighted by capitalization", and some are "weighted
by price."
When you have a capitalization-weighted index, the bigger the total value of
all the shares of your company, the bigger your company’s impact on the value
of the index. But when you have a share-price-weighted index, the share price
is what matters, not the total value of the company.
Let’s look at 2 examples: Apple and Microsoft, on the Dow and on the S&P.
- Apple’s market cap—the total value of all Apple stock—is just over $3 trillion. Microsoft’s is about $2.5 trillion.
- Apple’s share price, right now, is about $190, whereas Microsoft’s is about $340.
Since the Dow weights by price and Microsoft’s share price
is higher, Microsoft’s performance has a bigger effect on the performance of the
Dow than Apple’s performance. But since the S&P weights its components by
capitalization, and Apple is worth about $500 billion more than Microsoft,
Apple’s performance moves the S&P more than Microsoft’s.
A good day for Apple makes a more significant positive impact on the S&P, as just as good a day for Microsoft. A good day for Microsoft makes a bigger positive impact on the Dow, as just as good a day for Apple.
(The same logic
applies to bad days: bad days for Apple lower the S&P more than equally bad
days for Microsoft, and bad days for Microsoft lower the Dow more than equally
bad days for Apple.)
Professional financial advisors who act as fiduciaries (meaning they have to give you the advice that is in your best interest) recommend to so many people to invest in
indices because they’re diverse. By putting your money into an index, you’re
spreading that money out across dozens, if not hundreds or thousands, of companies.
If one day, or even for a while, several of the companies listed as components
of the index don’t do very well, the rest of the index might, so your losses won’t be as pronounced. The same is true of gains, though: if there’s one stock
on the index that gains 10,000% in a
year, but everyone else gains about 12%, then by investing in that index, your
returns will probably be much closer to 12% than 10,000%.
Comments
Post a Comment